Comments for Just Suppose http://www.justsuppose.com Hmmmm... Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:42:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 Comment on Getting Fancy with Flex 4 by Corey http://www.justsuppose.com/getting-fancy-with-flex-4/comment-page-1/#comment-951 Corey Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:10:48 +0000 http://www.justsuppose.com/?p=110#comment-951 Well, keep in mind Pixel Bender effects aren't hardware accelerated, but the flash player will distribute processing of individual scanlines to different CPU cores if you have them. But that said you just don't want to transition an entire display, it's useful for transitioning smaller areas, panels, etc. Just be responsible. ;) Well, keep in mind Pixel Bender effects aren’t hardware accelerated, but the flash player will distribute processing of individual scanlines to different CPU cores if you have them. But that said you just don’t want to transition an entire display, it’s useful for transitioning smaller areas, panels, etc. Just be responsible. ;)

]]> Comment on Getting Fancy with Flex 4 by sephiroth http://www.justsuppose.com/getting-fancy-with-flex-4/comment-page-1/#comment-950 sephiroth Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:52:54 +0000 http://www.justsuppose.com/?p=110#comment-950 really interesting article. Finally we can really play with PB and flex4. The only doubt that is bothering me , it's about the resource that the flash player with these fancy effect will eat out. I'm gonna experiment this and make you know Sephiroth really interesting article.

Finally we can really play with PB and flex4. The only doubt that is bothering me , it’s

about the resource that the flash player with these fancy effect will eat out.

I’m gonna experiment this and make you know

Sephiroth

]]> Comment on Some System.gc() and System.totalMemory Tips by NooRotic http://www.justsuppose.com/some-systemgc-and-systemtotalmemory-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-943 NooRotic Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:33:40 +0000 http://www.justsuppose.com/?p=80#comment-943 Great article, I've found over the years that gc is improving tremendously (in flash player overall) and your last point of how much a release build can differ from a debugger player is greatly missed by many. The last few years I've found that if I can keep the debugging version that I'm building within a happy medium, my release builds are that much better. Great article, I’ve found over the years that gc is improving tremendously (in flash player overall) and your last point of how much a release build can differ from a debugger player is greatly missed by many. The last few years I’ve found that if I can keep the debugging version that I’m building within a happy medium, my release builds are that much better.

]]> Comment on Some System.gc() and System.totalMemory Tips by Corey http://www.justsuppose.com/some-systemgc-and-systemtotalmemory-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-934 Corey Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:36:52 +0000 http://www.justsuppose.com/?p=80#comment-934 @John, right, but internally the first call only sets a flag and hints to the GC to collect on the next cycle. The second call is useless in that case (just sets the same flag). @John, right, but internally the first call only sets a flag and hints to the GC to collect on the next cycle. The second call is useless in that case (just sets the same flag).

]]> Comment on Some System.gc() and System.totalMemory Tips by John http://www.justsuppose.com/some-systemgc-and-systemtotalmemory-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-933 John Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:46:23 +0000 http://www.justsuppose.com/?p=80#comment-933 about calling the gc twice one for mark and one for sweep i think! about calling the gc twice one for mark and one for sweep i think!

]]>